Когато електронното устройство за гласуване е включено, електронното излъчване може да бъде уловено и обработено умишлено от отдалечено устройство, показват изследвания в специализиран доклад на всички видове гласуване в Нидерландия, който е станал повод за отказа на държавата да ползва устройствата за избори.
От тази уловена или остатъчна радиация може да се получи или извлече информация и по този начин могат да се „подслушват“ електронни устройства.
„Във въпросния доклад са описани всички видове машини за гласуване, всички начини на гласуване, в това число и с хартиени бюлетини и констатацията е, че и при машините, и при хартиените бюлетини могат да стават грешки.
Основната разлика е, че при хартиените бюлетини във всеки един момент може да имаме ръчно броене и контрол, докато при направена дори неволна грешка в софтуера, тя няма как да бъде установена“, коментира пред „Труд” заключенията на експертите от Нидерландия председателят на правната комисия в 48-ото НС Радомир Чолаков.
Идната седмица се очаква депутатите да отхвърлят ветото на президента Румен Радев за смесеното гласуване и в пленарна зала, след като късно в четвъртък това стана в правна комисия.
В доклада от Нидерландия, с който депутатите от правна комисия разполагат, е описано, че при машинното гласуване се регистрира „нечувствителност към грешки и възможност за манипулиране на електронните резултати“.
Въпросът за остатъчната или компрометиращата радиация е развит от гледна точка на извличане на информация от разстояние. „С помощта на модерно оборудване компрометиращото лъчение понякога може да бъде уловено от разстояние десетки метри.
По този начин екраните могат да се гледат на разстояние до десетки и дори стотици метри, без лицето, което работи с екрана, да знае за това“, се казва в изследването от Нидерландия.
И още: Електронното оборудване за гласуване също излъчва електромагнитно излъчване. Тайната на гласуването може да бъде нарушена чрез улавяне на компрометиращо лъчение, излъчвано от оборудването за гласуване. Под „компрометиране“ в този случай се има предвид „разкриване на това какъв глас е подаден от гласоподавателя“.
THE MURDER OF THE BORDER POLICE OFFICER AT OUR BORDER IS A LEGAL PROCESS!
THE MIA DID NOT TAKE ANY EFFECTIVE MEASURES TO RESPECT THE TRAFFICKERS AT THE BORDER!
THE SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR: "I WANT TO EMPHASIZE THOROUGHLY THAT I HAVE ORDERED THE ORDERS TO BE GIVEN WITH A LONG WEAPON!" "
IVAN DEMERDJIEV AND THE SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR SHOULD BE TRIED AND RECEIVE LIFE SENTENCES WITHOUT PAROLE!
ALL "MIGRANTS" ENTERING BULGARIA COME FROM THE CITY OF IDLIB - SYRIA, WHOSE TERRITORY IS UNDER THE CONTROL OF TURKEY AND THE TERRORIST GROUP - "AL NUSRA" - CREATED BY CIA AND MOSSAD!
THESE ARE MEN WHO HAVE PASSED SPECIAL MILITARY TRAINING - MURDERERS, SATRAPS AND THUGS!
THESE MEN WHO ARE CROSSING THE BORDER ARE CRIMINAL OFFENDERS IN SYRIA AND IF THEY COME INTO SYRIAN TERRITORY THEY ARE WAITING FOR LIFE SENTENCES AND THE SHOT FOR ALL THE CRIMES THAT THEY COMMITTED IN THE TERRITORY OF THE REPUBLIC OF SYRIA!
The wording "military" and not "military-technical" also includes manpower if necessary, he specified
The decision of the National Assembly, which commits the government to providing military aid to Ukraine, is unconstitutional and a gross interference with the executive prerogatives of the government.
Prof. Plamen Kirov, head of the Department of Constitutional and Legal Sciences at Sofia University "St. Kliment Ohridski" and former constitutional judge.
“In so far as the Constitution is categorical that the overall direction of the Armed Forces is exercised by the Government, not by Parliament. At the same time, the very logic is wrong - we burden the government to conduct negotiations with another party, and the other party to determine what it needs, and we to fulfill the will of the other party. They overdid it too crossed the line of the constitutional framework", the constitutionalist pointed out.
He specified that the wording "military" and not "military-technical" also includes "manpower if necessary".
Practice continues the parliament to be experienced as a convention since the time of the Jacobin dictatorship in revolutionary France, the professor of constitutional law also stated.
“He thinks that hardly holds all the levers of power and all branches of government—one all-competent body, and does not realize that there is a separation of powers.”
"In this situation, in which the country is hit by all kinds of crises that are piling up one on top of the other, it seems that no one is in charge. Everyone accounts for future negatives from one participation in management and literally It's a battle of who will pull the coals out of the furnace with their bare hands", commented Plamen Kirov in the show "Before All".
The time given by the president for consultations and reaching an agreement on the formation of a government was "interpreted in a rather wrong way" by the politicians in the parliament, he pointed out. "The responsibility is shared. Not only the president participates in the procedure, but also the political parties represented in the parliament. They are the actors in this political theater," Prof. Kirov said. In his words, the political talks should have started "from the night of the elections." It's strange to me - these cries in the media about how they didn't want to talk. Perhaps we should include the patriarch in these consultations, so that somehow he can calm them down and get them to have some kind word between themselves.''
Most likely the President's team also considers deadlines with the next elections in mind, the constitutionalist suggested.
"Let it be calculated, lest it should turn out that on New Year's Day we may be facing the polls again, in the middle of winter."
The introduction of a presidential republic Plamen Kirov defined as "political speaking, which makes absolutely no sense."
Recently, as I was going through airport security, a saleswoman stopped me and asked if I wanted to skip the security line. Intrigued, I invited her to tell me more. She took me to the CLEAR electronic kiosk and explained how the product works. For just $180 per year, I could skip long lines at airports, sporting events and other large gatherings. The company's website explains, “Instead of using traditional IDs, CLEAR uses your eyes and face to verify that it's really you.” The CLEAR system uses not only iris scanning and facial recognition, but also other biometrics such as fingerprints associated with demographic data you voluntarily submit and a link to your credit score (read the fine print in the consent box). CLEAR also has a Health Pass which stores proof of vaccinations, negative Covid tests and health examinations.
CLEAR is not the only enterprise working at the intersection of biometric and digital authentication. Plans for digital IDs have been in the works for several years, but they gained momentum during the pandemic. ID2020 is a non-profit alliance founded in 2016 with seed capital from Microsoft, Accenture, PricewaterhouseCoopers, the Rockefeller Foundation, Cisco and Gavi (a vaccine alliance founded by the Gates Foundation). ID2020's stated mission is to provide a digital identity for all people around the world by 2030. Digital IDs will be linked to fingerprints and other biometric data such as iris scans, demographic information, medical records, education data, travel, financial transactions and Bank accounts .
Almost two years ago Covid ID2020 published article, titled "Immunization: Digital Identity Entry Point". It claims that "Immunization presents a huge opportunity to scale digital identity." The article notes the cumbersome inefficiencies with paper immunization records and outlines how health challenges in developing nations can be used as a pretext for implementing digital IDs. A year earlier, Seth Berkley, CEO of Gavi, posted material in Nature , making the same argument: To achieve 100 percent vaccination rates in underdeveloped nations, we need digital IDs. Gavi promoted the same message at the World Economic Forum meetings in Davos.
The ID2020 article attempted to articulate the benefits of this system as follows: “Since immunization takes place in infancy, providing children with a digital child health card will give them a unique, portable digital identity at an early age.” explains that “as children grow, their digital child health card can be used to access secondary services, such as primary school, or to facilitate the process of obtaining alternative credentials. In practice, the child's health card becomes the first step in establishing a legal, widely recognized identity.
At first glance, this may sound reasonable. But consider: If a poor family does not accept the health NGO's preferred interventions for their children, those children may not be given another opportunity to establish the "legal, widely recognized identity" needed to access things like elementary school. In other words, you are literally nobody until you are vaccinated.
Just before the outbreak of the pandemic, in September 2019, ID2020 partnered with Gavi and began implementing this plan in action. Using vaccines as leverage, she launched a biometrics-based digital identity program for newborns in Bangladesh. The country's government embraced the initiative. When the pandemic began, ID2020 pivoted immediately to incorporate digital identification into Covid testing and other pandemic measures.
India's biometric identity system, Aadhaar, is the largest on the planet, with 1.3 billion digital IDs issued, covering 92 percent of the population. It requires Indian citizens to submit their photograph, iris scan, and fingerprints to qualify for social services, benefits, compensation, scholarships, statutory rights, and food programs. According to article in Financial Times , "Indian media reported several cases of people without cards starving to death because they could not access the benefits they were entitled to." As the author notes, some critics argue that India's Aadhaar system has "largely failed to fulfill its original promise of improving welfare and now acts as a tool for social exclusion and corporate influence'.
The use of biometrics for everyday transactions has routinized these technologies. We condition children to take biometric verification as a matter of course. Face ID is already being used in multiple school districts to expedite the movement of students through school lunch lines. Until recently, biometric data, such as fingerprints, were only used for high security purposes – for example, in the prosecution of a crime or the notarization of an important document. Today, routine biometric verification for repetitive activities from cell phones to lunch lines accustoms young people to the idea that their bodies are instruments used in transactions . We instrument the body in subtle but powerful ways.
Those with economic interests in creating markets for their products—whether vaccines, digital surveillance products, or collected data—will continue to use the carrot and stick of access to medical care and other services to promote digital IDs in the underdeveloped. nations. In developed nations, they will initially take a velvet-glove-and-push approach, selling digital IDs as convenience and time-saving measures that will be hard for many to reject, such as skipping long Transportation Security Administration security lines at the airports. Privacy risks, including the possibility of constant surveillance and data collection, will fade into the background when you're about to miss your flight if you can't jump to the front of the queue.
But as Nick Corbishley, author of a recent book on digital IDs, points out, decisions made now can have long-term negative consequences: “If biometrics are hacked, there's no way to undo the damage. You cannot change or cancel your iris, fingerprint or DNA, any more than you can change your password or cancel your credit card. Unless we collectively opt out of this new social experiment, digital IDs linked to private demographic, financial, location, movement, and biometric data will become mechanisms for mass data collection and population tracking around the world. Welcome in the new abnormal .
THE ARTIFICIAL INFLATION OF THE "REVIVAL" PP HAPPENS SO THAT IN THIS PARLIAMENT, THOSE WHO ARE "FIGHTING" THE MOST - THE COAT OF ARMS AND THE CHANGE - CAN JUMP IN FRONT OF THE WHOLE PEOPLE, AT THE ORDER OF THE ZIONISTS OF COURSE, AND SAY: " WE FORGET EVERYTHING THAT HAPPENED BETWEEN US DURING THE ELECTION CAMPAIGN IN THE NAME OF NATIONAL SALVATION AND EURO-ATLANTIC VALUES, WE MUST FORM A CABINET TO SAVE BULGARIA FROM ALL THE CRISES THAT HAPPENED TO HER"!